Thursday, Oct 8 | --:--
Back to home

McKinsey Trust Survey: RAI at 2.3 — Agentic Controls Still the Lag

McKinsey 2026 AI Trust Maturity Survey (~500 orgs, Dec 2025–Jan 2026): average RAI maturity 2.3 (from 2.0), but only ~30% hit level 3+ on strategy, governance, and agentic controls. Security is top barrier to scaling agents (~2/3); training gaps lead RAI blockers (~60%). Consultant survey — self-reported, not an audit.

Times of AI Desk 5 min read Global View as Markdown
Cover illustration for McKinsey Trust Survey: RAI at 2.3 — Agentic Controls Still the Lag

Adoption is racing into agents; trust tooling is not. McKinsey’s proprietary cut: average RAI maturity ticked up, but agentic governance is where the middle of the market still fails — security fear as the scale brake.

McKinsey (published March 25; fieldwork Dec 2025–Jan 2026) surveyed ~500 organizations with AI governance responsibility using a five-dimension RAI Maturity Model (strategy, risk management, data/technology, governance, plus agentic AI governance/controls). Average score 2.3 (from 2.0). Only ~30% at level 3+ in strategy, governance, and agentic controls. Asia–Pacific leads; tech/media/telecom and financial services outperform other sectors. Significant RAI investment correlates with higher maturity and material EBIT impact (McKinsey).

Signal McKinsey finding
Top barrier to scaling agentic AI Security/risk (~2/3 of respondents)
Top cited risks Inaccuracy; cybersecurity
Mitigation vs awareness Active mitigation lags across most risk categories
Incident frequency ~8% (stable); confidence in response declined
RAI implementation barrier Knowledge/training gaps (~60%)
Accountability Explicit RAI ownership → higher maturity

RAI increasingly framed as business enabler (value, efficiency, trust), not pure compliance.

Claims vs checks

Figures are McKinsey survey primary — self-reported maturity, not third-party audits. Sector and regional leads are within-sample. EBIT linkage is correlational as presented. Cross-check with other RAI surveys before treating 2.3 as industry absolute.

Limits

  • Survey of governance-responsible orgs skews toward those who already care.
  • “Level 3+” thresholds are McKinsey’s model, not a standard.
  • Agentic-control questions are new — year-over-year comparability is partial.

Sources

Prior Coverage

Earlier Times of AI reporting on this thread.

Scroll to continue reading