Thursday, Oct 8 | --:--
Back to home

GSA Restores Anthropic After NDCA Injunction Pauses Federal Ban

GSA (April 3) withdraws its Feb 27 Anthropic removal, restoring pre-directive access — system integrations, GSA Chat, external services, MAS — after Judge Rita Lin’s March 26 preliminary injunction blocked 17 agencies from enforcing the presidential stop-use directive and related supply-chain-risk designation. Temporary court pause, not a merits win.

Times of AI Desk 5 min read Washington, D.C. View as Markdown
Cover illustration for GSA Restores Anthropic After NDCA Injunction Pauses Federal Ban

Federal AI procurement can reverse in a week when a district court says pause. The GSA statement’s frame: restore the pre–February 27 status quo because the injunction — not a new agency preference — requires it.

U.S. GSA (April 3) withdrew its February 27 removal of Anthropic from federal systems and restored technology to the prior status quo, responding to a March 26 preliminary injunction from U.S. District Judge Rita F. Lin, N.D. Cal. (Case No. 26-cv-01996-RFL). Order blocked 17 named federal agencies from implementing/enforcing the presidential directive to stop using Anthropic tools and related supply-chain-risk designation pending further proceedings; stayed seven days, effective ~April 2.

Timeline

Date Event
Feb 27 GSA removes Anthropic from USAi.gov and MAS under presidential stop-use directive (tied to supply-chain-risk designation)
Mar 26 NDCA grants Anthropic PI
~Apr 2 Stay lifts; order effective
Apr 3 GSA withdraws removal; restores access

Restoration scope (GSA)

  • System integrations with Anthropic products continue.
  • Anthropic models in GSA Chat.
  • Available in external-facing services.
  • Remains on Multiple Award Schedule.

Related DoD supply-chain-risk litigation continues in parallel tracks.

Claims vs checks

GSA operational restoration is agency primary. Injunction scope is court order. This is preliminary relief — not a final judgment that the supply-chain designation was unlawful. DoD/NSA Mythos tensions later in April show the broader fight is not settled by GSA alone.

Limits

  • PI can be modified/appealed.
  • Agency-by-agency compliance may lag GSA’s statement.
  • Underlying designation merits unresolved.

Sources

Prior Coverage

Earlier Times of AI reporting on this thread.

Scroll to continue reading